Election Commission (EC) chairman, Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman is reported by Malaysiakini to have said that it is the Cabinet’s decision to scrap the usage of inedible ink in the recent general election.
“I have not told the country about this (before) but what happened was that cabinet rejected our proposed law (on indelible ink) on Feb 13 - the day dissolution of Parliament was done,” claimed Rashid.
However, the Prime Minister, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi says although the government in principle decided against its usage, it was delivered in the form of an opinion rather than an instruction, according to a report by Bernama.
Now, who is telling the truth here? Can someone shed light to this issue?
The decision to scrap the use of the ink was announced several days before polling day, citing claims that several irresponsible people have ordered the ink to illegally mark them on the fingers of unsuspecting voters. However, investigations reveal that there is no such truth to the claims!
Surely, there must be some hidden agenda behind the scrap of the usage of the inedible ink! Isn’t the EC suppose to be independent from interference from the Cabinet, even if it is really an opinion?

